Think You Can Fire Employees Based Upon Their Facebook Comments? Think Again…
In the most recent chapter on social media and the law, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) recently filed a complaint against American Medical Response of Connecticut, Inc. (“AMR” or the “Company”), claiming that the Company violated federal labor law when it disciplined and then terminated an employee who posted disparaging remarks about her supervisor on her Facebook page.
In In re American Medical Response of Connecticut, Inc., Case No. 34-CA-12576 (October 27, 2010), the NLRB filed an unfair labor practice charge against AMR, asserting that the Company’s suspension and termination of an employee who posted disparaging comments about her supervisor violated Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”), which protects unionized and non-unionized employees’ rights to “engage in concerted activity.” According to the Complaint, the employee requested union representation in response to a performance critique and the supervisor then allegedly threatened the employee with discipline. Later that day, the employee posted disparaging remarks on her Facebook page about her supervisor from the employee’s home computer.
AMR suspended and then terminated the employee because she allegedly violated the Company’s social media and internet policies by disparaging her supervisor on Facebook. The Complaint alleges that the Company’s social media policies were too broad because they interfered with employees’ rights to communicate with one another about the terms and conditions of employment and, therefore, violated Section 7 of the NLRA. While this is the first unfair labor practice complaint relating to an employer’s social media policies, many do not believe it will be the last.
The message for employers, both union and non-union, is clear. While the law in this area is far from settled, employers should review their social media policies immediately to ensure that they are not broader than necessary and thus susceptible to an unfair labor practice charge or other claim. In addition, employers are well advised to use caution before discharging or disciplining any employee based on activity or comments made by employees on social media sites. As evidenced by the Pietrylo and Stengart cases, about which we recently blogged, disciplinary action related to employees’ arguably private use of technology may also lead to claims for, among other things, violation of privacy and violation of applicable wiretapping and stored communications laws.
As the law continues to evolve on these matters, please note that this article is current as of date and time of publication and may not reflect subsequent developments. The content and interpretation of the issues addressed herein is subject to change. Cole Schotz P.C. disclaims any and all liability with respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all of the contents of this publication to the fullest extent permitted by law. This is for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship. Do not act or refrain from acting upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining legal, financial and tax advice. For further information, please do not hesitate to reach out to your firm contact or to any of the attorneys listed in this publication.
Join Our Mailing List
Stay up to date with the latest insights, events, and more