Focus on State Estate Taxes

Save as PDF

We were alerted by one of our blog readers last week to a Wall Street Journal editorial published on February 8 stating that, from an estate tax perspective, New Jersey is the worst state in which to die. The article explains that up to 54% of a New Jersey decedent’s wealth could be lost to estate taxes in 2011 (New York decedents would lose 45.4%). While we disagree with some of the factual assertions set forth in the article (including that the state death tax deduction is new in 2011 – it is not and has been in place since 2005), we agree with the larger point that state estate taxes should be a significant concern for New Jersey (and New York) taxpayers.

With the federal estate tax exemption at $5 million per person in 2011 and 2012, the margin between the New Jersey exemption ($675,000) and the New York exemption ($1 million) has widened appreciably. The consequence is that for married taxpayers who want to take advantage of the first spouse to die’s full federal exemption and pass $5 million to their beneficiaries (for example, to an exemption trust for the benefit of the surviving spouse and/or children), then without special planning, a New Jersey/New York estate tax of approximately $391,600 would be due. Parties must consider whether it is worthwhile to pay some state level estate tax in the first spouse to die’s estate, especially in light of the fact that beginning in 2011, a married decedent’s federal estate tax exemption is portable, meaning the surviving spouse can use the first spouse to die’s unused estate tax exemption amount.

A number of variables factor into the decision, including: (1) the size of the surviving spouse’s estate; (2) all appreciation of the assets owned in the exemption trust will pass free of federal and state estate taxes in the future; (3) the current law is in place for two years, and as a result, the federal exemption amount could be reduced and estate tax rates (currently 35%) could be increased; (4) the age of surviving spouse; and (5) future plans of the surviving spouse, who possibly could move to a state with no estate tax (ie, Florida).

All of these decisions lead to another point. Estate plans need to be drafted in a very flexible manner to enable different decisions to be made depending on each taxpayer’s individual circumstances. It is not appropriate in this tax environment to have an inflexible plan.

As the law continues to evolve on these matters, please note that this article is current as of date and time of publication and may not reflect subsequent developments. The content and interpretation of the issues addressed herein is subject to change. Cole Schotz P.C. disclaims any and all liability with respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all of the contents of this publication to the fullest extent permitted by law. This is for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship. Do not act or refrain from acting upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining legal, financial and tax advice. For further information, please do not hesitate to reach out to your firm contact or to any of the attorneys listed in this publication.

Join Our Mailing List

Stay up to date with the latest insights, events, and more

Check all areas of law you are interested in receiving e-newsletters and alerts about:(Required)
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Our Practices



Our Industries