Close

One of the region’s largest, most experienced groups of commercial trial lawyers, our Litigation Department has achieved success in hundreds of trials in state and federal courts.

Throughout New Jersey, New York, Delaware, Maryland and Texas, we are recognized as the region’s “bet the company” litigation team.  We frequently arbitrate and mediate as alternatives to litigation.  We also counsel our clients on how to avoid litigation.  First and foremost, our clients see us as problem solvers.

+ READ MORE

Litigation Representative Matters

  • Successfully obtained a reversal in the Appellate Division and then decision from the New Jersey Supreme Court, in favor our client in an eminent domain matter where our clients’ property was taken from them, as the Court determined, without constitutional just compensation, based on the valuation date used by the trial court and advocated by the municipality taking the property.

  • Recovered a substantial judgment on behalf of a surety client against the State of New Jersey after a 10-day bench trial and a 175-page written decision.  The Court found that the State had improperly terminated our client from the renovation of a state building after our client had funded substantial work, refusing to pay our client for such work, and rejecting the State’s counterclaims based on the work performed by the State’s substitute completion contractor.

  • Represented a national retailer of fine jewelry, in a breach of contract action relating to the production of a line of jewelry allegedly licensed by a celebrity.  We defeated a motion by the manufacturer seeking to prevent our client from selling that jewelry, and the matter settled shortly thereafter favorably to our client.

  • Obtained a judgment for a client declaring the non-infringement and invalidity of a real estate tax patent owned by another company, which determination we were able to successfully defend on appeal before the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals.

  • Represented a New Jersey state authority against a multi-million dollar claim that it had negligently failed to require that a payment bond be posted under the New Jersey Bond Act for a particular major development project.  We obtained dismissal of the claim by written decision based on numerous grounds, including a lack of jurisdiction by the trial court, the inapplicability of the Bond Act and immunity under the Tort Claims Act.

  • On behalf of an employer client, we obtained a temporary restraining order preventing its former employee from (1) violating his non-compete agreement by working for one of the client’s competitors; (2) disclosing any of our client’s confidential and proprietary information to any other person or entity; (3) soliciting or communicating with any of our client’s competitor’s clients; and (4) ordering that the former employee immediately return all confidential and proprietary information to our client.  This decision led to the negotiation of a settlement on very favorable terms.

  • Successfully represented an individual removed as a Director of a non-profit corporation for alleged misconduct.  Following an eight-day bench trial, our client prevailed and obtained all of the relief requested in the Complaint, which led to our client’s reinstatement as a member of the Board of Directors and as a Trustee, and the by-laws and member list advanced by our client were declared to govern.

  • Concluding nine years of litigation, the New Jersey Supreme Court affirmed the prior decisions we obtained in the Appellate Division, trial court and in arbitration in favor of our client, the majority owner of an automobile dealership chain, against the minority owner who was ousted.

  • At trial, we succeeded in establishing equal ownership for our client in a group of large, closely held businesses and obtained a judgment directing the forced sale of the opposing shareholder's interests.  Then, on appeal, we obtained favorable valuation rulings, as the Appellate Division recognized a key man marketability discount in the first reported New Jersey case applying such a discount.

In May 2006, a national bank instituted an action against an individual and his entities seeking to restrain transfers of actions relating to more than 300 real properties in New Jersey.  The commencement of this action forced numerous lenders, property owners, investors and creditors claiming an interest in the properties and business entities to intervene and/or file related proceedings, resulting in the largest Chancery Court case in New Jersey of that year.  Over 30 related actions were filed shortly after the commencement of this action.  The Court appointed a fiscal agent/trustee in liquidation to oversee the management, operation and liquidation of the properties, valued at approximately $400 million.

Cole Schotz counseled its client through a myriad of intricate issues, protecting his ownership interest in the properties and prosecuting and defending numerous claims against the principal defendant and certain creditors.  The proceedings presented complex litigation, real estate, corporate and potential insolvency issues.  A team of Cole Schotz attorneys across different departments analyzed the various claims and issues of the parties and formulated a strategy to protect and stabilize the assets and the client's position.  This complicated and fast-paced litigation resulted in the entry of over 250 court orders in 2006.

The proceedings afforded the multidisciplinary group of Cole Schotz attorneys opportunities to negotiate the sale of several substantial commercial properties to potential buyers, assist the fiscal agent in establishing the process and procedure for marketing and liquidating the properties in a manner that maximizes value to the estate, assist in establishing the procedure for pursuing and adjudicating creditor claims, and demonstrate its sophisticated litigation expertise.

The largest New Jersey Chancery Court cases provided the firm with the forum in which to demonstrate its capabilities across different commercial practice areas.

Analytics Could Change How We Litigate

New Jersey Law Journal October 3, 2014

Justin S. Levy
Mediation Strategies and Considerations

Today's General Counsel October 2014

James W. Walker
Courts Reverse Trend on Interpretation of 303(b)(1)

American Bankruptcy Institute October 2014

G. David Dean
+ MORE
 

Hosted on the FirmWise platform.

© Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard, P.A.

DISCLAIMER

The materials on this site have been prepared by Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard, P.A. for general informational purposes only and are not intended to constitute legal advice. Viewers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel on the specific facts and circumstances in question from an attorney licensed in their jurisdiction. Use of this site does not create an attorney-client relationship between the user and Cole Schotz or any lawyer(s) within the firm. Any information sent to Cole Schotz or its lawyers through this site will not be treated as confidential and is not protected by the attorney-client privilege.

© Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard, P.A.

Attorney Advertising

This website is an advertisement for a law firm. Statements and previous outcomes do not imply similar results in your matters.

© Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard, P.A.